Let's start by looking at one of the most commonly-referenced pieces of evidence for William being the player: The Man in Room 1280 Did the new information actively rewrite the story of these games, or did was our understanding of the games flawed from the start?Ĭase in point: though we all thought we had Ultimate Custom Night figured out, could it be that we were actually missing clues that could have pointed us in a different direction? And could recent games and books be hinting toward that solution? I've given it some thought (and by that, I mean I've thought this over for months at this point), and I think I have it figured out. Now, a lot of details have fallen under scrutiny. Since then, the FNaF community has been given a great deal of new information to work with, including some which has changed our perception of the original 7 games. Though animatronics referred to "The One You Should Not Have Killed", indicating that the player has taken at least one life, some were quick to point out that there are actually two characters who match that description: William Afton, the infamous Purple Guy and the killer of no fewer than 11 children over the course of the story, and Michael Afton, the guy who's literally purple and who's responsible for the death of his younger brother (hereby referred to as the Bite Victim). There was a debate among theorists regarding who we play as throughout each nightmarish night. Were we wrong? In the early days of Ultimate Custom Night,
0 kommentar(er)
